Prince Harry has been slammed on GB News following reports he is no longer bringing his wife and their two children to the UK. The Duke of Sussex, 41, is heading to the UK next month to mark the one-year countdown event for the 2027 Invictus Games, and was meant to be joined by Meghan Markle and their two children, Prince Archie, seven, and five-year-old Princess Lilibet. However, after Harry and his family were reportedly refused taxpayer-funded security while in the UK, the Duke is now considering leaving his family in California.

Harry has been accused of “throwing his toys out of the pram” by Nana Akua, who launched a scathing attack on the Duke during her GB News show. She began: “The Sussexes, they’re on their way to the UK, or not because guess what, the British taxpayer doesn’t fancy paying for their security.

“The spoilt brat, the Duke of Sussex, may well throw his toys out of the pram once again. After announcing his visit to the UK, the prince later learned that his family will not receive police protection during what was intended to be an Invictus Games related five-day visit.”

Nana claimed Harry “compromised his own security” by revealing intimate details in his 2023 memoir Spare, and argued that he is using his two children as a bargaining chip to demand protection.

She continued: “After compromising his own security and that of his family in his book Spare, when he revealed his kill count in Afghanistan and whinged about how terrible it is to be the son of the King, Prince Harry has been on what I would describe as a crusade to destroy the British press who it appears he blames for the death of his mother.

“Harry has taken both the press and the Home Office to court and he’s chucked in a dose of emotional blackmail, where he has used his children as a bargaining chip to demand Ravec, the highest level of protection only afforded to working royals – a role that he and his wife turned their noses up as in their pursuit of a worldwide privacy tour.”

The presenter added that if their visit goes ahead, Harry and Meghan will only receive taxpayer-funded security when they are inside a royal property.

Harry is reportedly “desperate” for Archie and Lilibet to see their grandfather, King Charles, who they last saw four years ago.

“I’m sorry, but I’m not buying that. Here’s a thought, Harry. Why don’t you apply for protection for the visit for you and your family with the sole purpose of taking your children to see the King, not while you swan around promoting other stuff. It’s not that difficult!”